The burden of disease and quality of life in patients with acute hepatic porphyria: COPHASE study / Carga de la enfermedad y calidad de vida en pacientes con porfiria hepática aguda: estudio COPHASE

Background: Acute hepatic porphyria (AHP) comprises a group of rare genetic diseases characterized by neurovisceral crises that are manifested by abdominal pain and neurological and/or psychological symptoms that interfere with the ability to lead a normal life. Our objective was to determine the burden of the disease in one year and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with AHP. Results: 28 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 36.6±10.2 years, 89.3% were women, and the average number of crises was 1.9±1.5. The average annual cost per patient was €38,255.40. 80.2% of the costs was direct medical costs, 17.5% was associated with loss of productivity and 2.3% was direct non-medical costs. 85.9% of the total cost corresponded to the crises. The intercrisis period accounted for the remaining 14.1%. The global index of the EQ-5D-5L (HRQoL) was 0.75±0.24. The dimensions of pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression and daily activities were the most affected. Leisure, travel/vacations and household activities were the most affected daily activities. 53.6% of patients required a caregiver due to AHP. 92.9% did not present overload and 7.1% presented extreme overload. Conclusions: Patients with AHP are associated with a high economic impact and an affected HRQoL in the pain/discomfort dimension, with a negative impact on the performance of daily activities and a risk of psychiatric diseases.(AU)

Antecedentes: La porfiria hepática aguda (PHA) comprende un grupo de enfermedades genéticas raras caracterizadas por crisis neuroviscerales que se manifiestan por dolor abdominal y síntomas neurológicos y/o psicológicos que interfieren en la capacidad de llevar una vida normal. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar la carga de la enfermedad en un año y la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) en pacientes con PHA. Resultados: Se analizaron 28 pacientes. La edad media fue de 36,6±10,2 años, el 89,3% eran mujeres y la media de crisis fue de 1,9±1,5. El coste medio anual por paciente fue de 38.255,40€. El 80,2% de los costes fueron costes médicos directos, el 17,5% estuvieron asociados a pérdida de productividad y el 2,3% fueron costes directos no médicos. El 85,9% del coste total correspondió a las crisis. El período entre crisis representó el 14,1% restante. El índice global del EQ-5D-5L (HRQoL) fue de 0,751±0,24. Las dimensiones de dolor/malestar, ansiedad/depresión y actividades cotidianas fueron las más afectadas. Ocio, viajes/vacaciones y actividades del hogar fueron las actividades diarias más afectadas. El 53,6% de los pacientes requirieron un cuidador debido a la PHA. El 92,9% no presentaron sobrecarga y el 7,1% presentaron sobrecarga extrema. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con PHA se asocian con un alto impacto económico y una CVRS afectada en la dimensión dolor/malestar, con impacto negativo en el desempeño de las actividades diarias y riesgo de enfermedades psiquiátricas.(AU)

Napkin math can change the world.

Mathematical models hold the key to equitable patient care.

The actual status of drug prices and adjustment factors for drug price calculation: an analysis of ultra-orphan drug development in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Extremely high prices facilitate drug development for ultra-rare diseases (ultra-orphan drugs). However, various problems arise in terms of healthcare financing and fairness, and the status of ultra-orphan drug pricing remains ambiguous. In this study, we investigated ultra-orphan drug prices in Japan relative to that of other drugs. We examined the relationship between annual expected drug prices and expected sales, and the expected number of patients, for 393 drugs containing new active ingredients for therapeutic use that were listed on the National Health Insurance drug price list in Japan between April 16, 2010 and August 26, 2020. In addition, we compared prices, the drug price calculation method, and price calculation adjustment factors for ultra-orphan and other drugs. RESULTS: Drug prices tended to increase as the expected number of patients to whom the drug was administered decreased; however, this trend diminished when the expected number of patients was less than 1000. On the other hand, the expected sales tended to decrease as the number of expected patients decreased, and this tendency was reinforced when the expected number of patients was less than 1000. The cost accounting method tended to be used for the price calculation of ultra-orphan drugs, but there were no price differences based on the drug price calculation method. Regarding the price calculation adjustment factors, the premium for usefulness tended to be higher for ultra-orphan drugs. The premium for marketability was higher for non-orphan drugs but did not differ from that for orphan drugs, except for ultra-orphan drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The status of drug prices and expected sales differed beyond a threshold of 1000 expected patients, indicating that recovering the development cost for ultra-orphan drugs is difficult. In addition, the higher premium for usefulness for ultra-orphan drugs reflects the largely unmet need of the associated diseases. Scarcity among orphan drugs is not considered for marketability, highlighting the need for a new framework to promote the development of ultra-orphan drugs.

“Many of us are rare”: the right to health and the moral economy of rare diseases activism in Brazil (1990-2020)

This article discusses the different meanings attributed to the right to health in the mobilizations to guarantee care for rare disease patients in Brazil. Since the early 1990s, rare disease patient family associations have been putting agendas to the public authorities, with demands ranging from the recognition of diseases to the development of research and diagnostic tests. The trajectory of the mobilizations to guarantee care for rare disease patients is part of a broader process of social articulation around the possibilities and limits of the Brazilian National Health System. The right to health is at the center of this process, being the Subject of varied debates and interpretations in the political, health, and legal arenas, involving arguments guided by scientific evidence, legal principles, and moral values. We argue that these variations in the directions of the right to health have involved concomitant processes of strengthening networks of rare disease actors and institutions, and of maturing the health care system, both converging towards the establishment of a “moral economy of rare disease patients”. This moral economy is centered on the idea that the public health relevance of these diseases cannot be identified by epidemiological evidence, but rather by individual and family experience. We used a wide scope of documentation: texts from newspapers and magazines widely circulated in the country, legislative material, publications in specialized journals, and website materials from rare disease patient organizations in Brazil (AU)

Client Service Receipt Inventory as a standardised tool for measurement of socio-economic costs in the rare genetic disease population (CSRI-Ra).

The measurement of costs is fundamental in healthcare decision-making, but it is often challenging. In particular, standardised methods have not been developed in the rare genetic disease population. A reliable and valid tool is critical for research to be locally meaningful yet internationally comparable. Herein, we sought to develop, contextualise, translate, and validate the Client Service Receipt Inventory for the RAre disease population (CSRI-Ra) to be used in cost-of-illness studies and economic evaluations for healthcare planning. Through expert panel discussions and focus group meetings involving 17 rare disease patients, carers, and healthcare and social care professionals from Hong Kong, we have developed the CSRI-Ra. Rounds of forward and backward translations were performed by bilingual researchers, and face validity and semantic equivalence were achieved through interviews and telephone communications with focus group participants and an additional of 13 healthcare professional and university students. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess criterion validity between CSRI-Ra and electronic patient record in a sample of 94 rare disease patients and carers, with overall ICC being 0.69 (95% CI 0.56-0.78), indicating moderate to good agreement. Following rounds of revision in the development, contextualisation, translation, and validation stages, the CSRI-Ra is ready for use in empirical research. The CSRI-Ra provides a sufficiently standardised yet adaptable method for collecting socio-economic data related to rare genetic diseases. This is important for near-term and long-term monitoring of the resource consequences of rare diseases, and it provides a tool for use in economic evaluations in the future, thereby helping to inform planning for efficient and effective healthcare. Adaptation of the CSRI-Ra to other populations would facilitate international research.

An analysis of member retention patterns for adult rare disease cohorts to support evaluating multiyear payment arrangements for novel therapies.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, treatment for chronic conditions addressed symptoms or was disease modifying and required lifelong periodic administration and recurring costs. Cell and gene therapies for rare diseases often require a short administration period relative to their expected long-term clinical benefit. Costs have historically been recognized when the service or treatment is administered, resulting in the potential for the cost associated with the possible long-term clinical benefit of cell and gene therapies being incurred during a short administration period. Innovative payment arrangements have been proposed to improve the synchronization of the payment and the emergence of the clinical benefit. Expected payments associated with a multiyear payment arrangement will depend on many factors, but key drivers of the payments include efficacy, durability of effect, mortality, and member retention. This research extends a previous study by analyzing member retention for adult patients with certain rare diseases. OBJECTIVE: To develop member retention estimates from a US commercial payer's perspective for adults diagnosed with certain rare diseases during a 10-year period. METHODS: Four population cohorts were examined: (1) self-insured - all subscribers, (2) self-insured - rare medical condition, (3) fully insured - all subscribers, and (4) fully insured - rare medical condition. Seven rare medical conditions were prospectively selected: cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, Gaucher disease, hemophilia, sickle cell disease, spina bifida, and thalassemia. We limited the study cohort to members who were either the subscriber or the subscriber's partner and were aged 18 years or older; dependent children were excluded from the analysis, regardless of age. The IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters research database for the 10 years ending December 31, 2016, was used as the basis for the analysis. The analysis was completed using the lifetest procedure available in version 9.4 of the SAS Software System for Windows. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to produce retention rates. A log-rank test with chi-square statistic was used to determine statistically significant differences between pairs of curves. RESULTS: The study found that the subscriber retention for the rare medical condition cohort is significantly higher than the all-subscribers cohort by at least 12 points at each 1-year period. The finding was statistically significant (P < 0.0001) for the self-insured and fully insured cohorts. At year 5, approximately 20% more of the rare medical condition cohort was retained as compared with the all-subscribers cohort regardless of payer type. In addition, the study found that the probability of retention for adults with each rare medical condition in the rare disease cohort was also statistically significantly higher than all subscribers regardless of payer type. CONCLUSIONS: In multiyear payment arrangements, it may be important to set expectations for member retention based on studies specific to particular member cohorts. Health insurers and plan administrators may have inaccurate expectations if standard assumptions based on all member populations are used. This study found that adults diagnosed with 1 of 7 rare medical conditions are retained longer, on average, than all adult subscribers. DISCLOSURES: Milliman received funding from bluebird bio for the conduct of this study and fees from AveXis, outside the submitted work. Jackson, Runyan, and Metz are employed by Milliman. Jackson and Metz are members of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the qualification standards for performing the analyses in this report. Kenney is an independent managed care consultant and received consulting fees from Milliman during the conduct of this study; Kenney also serves as preceptor for the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, is immediate past president of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy, and is a member of the Massachusetts Pharmacists Association Legislative Committee.

Can the Consideration of Societal Costs Change the Recommendation of Economic Evaluations in the Field of Rare Diseases? An Empirical Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether the adoption of a societal perspective would alter the results and conclusions of economic evaluations for rare disease-related healthcare technologies. METHODS: A search strategy involving all the active substances considered as orphan drugs by the European Medicines Agency plus a list of 76 rare diseases combined with economic-related terms was conducted on Medline and the Cost-Effectiveness Registry from the beginning of 2000 until November 2018. We included studies that considered quality-adjusted life years as an outcome, were published in a scientific journal, were written in English, included informal care costs or productivity losses, and separated the results according to the applied perspective. RESULTS: We found 14 articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Productivity losses were considered in 12 studies, the human capital approach being the method most frequently used. Exclusively, informal care was considered in 2 articles, being valued through the opportunity cost method. The 14 articles selected resulted in 26 economic evaluation estimations, from which incremental cost-utility ratio values changed from cost-effective to dominant in 3 estimates, but the consideration of societal costs only modified the authors' conclusion in 1 study. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of societal costs in the economic evaluation of rare diseases did not affect the conclusions of the studies except in a single specific case. In those studies where the societal perspective was considered, we did not find significant changes in the economic evaluation results due to the higher costs of treatments and the low quality-adjusted life-years gained.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with rare disease in Hong Kong.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant health, social, and economic consequences internationally. While the pandemic has direct implications on infected patients and families, there is a need to examine the pandemic's effect on patients with non-COVID-19-related diseases. This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on 272 rare disease patients with 89 distinct rare diseases in Hong Kong using a cross-sectional online survey between April 10 and April 29, 2020 from the patient and caregiver perspective. The pandemic has impacted patient's health status in 46%, service use patterns in 71%, mental health in 79%, daily living in 82%, social life in 92%, and financial status in 81% of patients. Patient's health status, medical and rehabilitation, and mental health were more impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the group of patients with any level of dependency according to the Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living compared with that in the group of patients who are fully independent (p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001; p = 0.0420). This study is the first study to examine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the rare disease population in Hong Kong, and demonstrates the pandemic's effect on service and resource utilization, and patient's physical and mental well-being.

Limitations and Challenges of Conducting Budget Impact Analyses in Rare Diseases: A Case Study of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.

OBJECTIVES: There are challenges in conducting a budget impact analysis (BIA) for rare disorders. Through this case study, we present some challenges and limitations of a BIA of managing patients affected with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). We explored a conceptual basis and barriers for health services researchers interested in quantifying budget impacts of rare disease management program (DMP). METHODS: We developed a static budget impact cost calculator model in Microsoft Excel, obtaining the clinical impact of a DMP from the literature and translating it into costs using OLDW. Cost inputs and resource use was obtained from 2010 to 2015 claims data using the OLDW. Insurers' payments were calculated and categorized into the following cost buckets: physician visits, emergency room visits, inpatients stays, augmentation therapy, other prescription drugs costs, and other costs. RESULTS: Data were based on 6832 patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency identified among over 21 million OLDW enrollees observed between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015. The introduction of a DMP was estimated to decrease costs of the management of patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency by $13.5 million over 5 years. The savings attributed to the program over the 5-year time horizon are due to 2555 exacerbations, 5180 emergency room visits, 9342 specialist visits, and 105 358 general practitioner visits avoided. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive DMP for a rare condition might provide cost savings to a health plan. BIAs for rare disease may be more informative if they focus on DMPs rather than on individual drugs.

One drug to treat many diseases: unlocking the economic trap of rare diseases.

There are two major problems with the development of therapies for rare diseases. First, among over 7000 such diseases, the vast majority are caused by genetic defects and/or include neurodegeneration, making them very difficult to treat. Second, drugs for rare diseases, so-called orphan drugs, are extremely expensive, as only a small number of patients are interested in purchasing them. This results in the appearance of a specific economic trap of rare diseases; namely, despite high biomedical, pharmaceutical and technological potential, the development of new orphan drugs is blocked by the economic reality. The purpose of this work was to find a potential solution that might resolve this economic trap of rare diseases. A literature review was conducted, and a hypothesis was formulated assuming that the use of one drug for the treatment of many rare diseases might overcome the economic trap. We provide examples showing that finding such drugs is possible. Thus, a possible solution for the problem of developing orphan drugs is presented. Further preclinical and clinical studies, although neither easy nor inexpensive, should verify whether the hypothesis regarding the possibility of unlocking the economic trap of rare diseases is valid.

HTA methodology and value frameworks for evaluation and policy making for cell and gene therapies.

This last decade has been marked by significant advances in the development of cell and gene (C&G) therapies, such as gene targeting or stem cell-based therapies. C&G therapies offer transformative benefits to patients but present a challenge to current health technology decision-making systems because they are typically reviewed when clinical efficacy data are very limited and when there is uncertainty about the long-term durability of outcomes. These challenges are not unique to C&G therapies, but they face more of these barriers, reflecting the need for adapting existing value assessment frameworks. Still, C&G therapies have the potential to be cost-effective even at very high price points. The impact on healthcare budgets will depend on the success rate of pipeline assets and on the extent to which C&G therapies will expand to wider pathologies beyond rare or ultra-rare diseases. Getting pricing and reimbursement models right is important for incentivising research and development investment while not jeopardising the sustainability of healthcare systems. Payers and manufacturers therefore need to acknowledge each other's constraints-limitations in the evidence generation on the manufacturer side, budget considerations on the payer side-and embrace innovative thinking and approaches to ensure timely delivery of therapies to patients. Several experts in health technology assessment and clinical experts have worked together to produce this publication and identify methodological and policy options to improve the assessment of C&G therapies, and make it happen better, faster and sustainably in the coming years.

[Orphan drugs and drug pirates]. / Weesgeneesmiddelen en medicijnkapers.

The European Orphan Medicines Regulation, which came into effect in 2000, stimulates the development of medicines for rare diseases. The number of registered orphan medicines has increased from eight in 2000 to 169 in 2019; 38% of these are available in the Netherlands. The costs for orphan medicines in the Netherlands are increasing by 9% every year, and now amount to €272 million annually. There is, however, still no effective medication for thousands of rare diseases. The Orphan Regulation was intended for new orphan medicines, but some companies also use it for 'repurposing' of old agents, for which they also get 10 years exclusive market rights in the EU. The improper use of legislation has led to concern among patients, doctors, and medical insurance companies. The Netherlands Council for Public Health and Society and MPs in the lower house of the Netherlands parliament have proposed measures for tackling the high prices of medicines and Mr. Bruins, the former Minister of Health, wanted to propose legislative change in the EU. The EU 'pharmaceutical incentive review' offers the possibility to revise the current rules.

Regulatory approval and public drug plan listing of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada and New Zealand.

A previous assessment of the alignment of health technology assessments and price negotiations for new drugs for rare disorders in Canada completed between 2014 and 2018 demonstrated that it is working for governments but has yet to lead to improved access in a timely manner for all appropriate patients in all provinces. In this analysis, drugs for rare and ultra-rare disorders with a completed price negotiation or no negotiation between 2014 and 2018 in Canada, and their reimbursement recommendations and listings in Canadian public drug programs are compared with their regulatory approval in New Zealand and listing in the New Zealand National Formulary. The results show that pharmaceutical manufacturers generally seek regulatory approval for rare disorder drugs in Canada before New Zealand, and fewer rare disorder medicines receive regulatory approval in New Zealand. One reason for this difference might be New Zealand's smaller population. However, another reason is likely the restrictive drug formulary in New Zealand. Drugs not given coverage in New Zealand are frequently made unavailable by the manufacturer. Planned changes to Canada's pricing regulations and guidelines will significantly diminish the country's attractiveness as a place in which pharmaceutical companies want to do business, which has the potential to negatively impact the health of all Canadians irrespective of whether they have private or public drug coverage.

[Participant-funded clinical trials on rare diseases]. / Ensayos clínicos en enfermedades raras financiados por los participantes.

The development of medicines for certain rare diseases can be frustrated by lack of funding. In certain cases the patients themselves, or their relatives, occasionally fund the clinical trial in which they will be treated with the investigational medicine. There are 3models of self-funded research: 2of them, "pay to try" and "pay to participate", have already been put into practice. The third, the "plutocratic" proposal, which has been recently put forward is still a theoretical model. In this work the scientific, social and ethical benefits and risks of the 2clinical research models, "pay to participate" and the "plutocratic" proposal, are reviewed. Patient-funded clinical trials are frequently performed through crowdfunding. The most controversial aspects of this funding modality are also addressed in this article from several perspectives. Finally, a future scenario that would allow the launching of self-funded clinical trials in Spain by the "plutocratic" proposal is proposed.

Alignment of health technology assessments and price negotiations for new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: Does it lead to improved patient access?

A previous assessment of submissions for rare disorder drugs made to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) found that, from 2012, all positive recommendations included criteria advocating a price reduction. Since 2016, CADTH and the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA), which conducts drug price negotiations with manufacturers for all public drug programs, have aligned their processes. This analysis examined drugs for rare and ultra-rare disorders (DRDs and DURDs)-prevalence of ≤20 to >2 and ≤2 per 100,000, respectively-with a completed pCPA negotiation or no negotiation between 2014 and 2018, together with their reimbursement recommendations and listings in public drug programs. A positive recommendation led to a successful price negotiation for 81.8% and 78.6% of the DRD and DURD submissions and a negative recommendation to no negotiation for 100.0% and 66.7%. Less than half the recommendations for DURDs reported before 2016 mentioned the need for a substantial price reduction, but this increased to 80% in those reported from 2016 onwards. A successful price negotiation led to listing in the majority of the public drug programs and a negative recommendation usually led to no listing. The CADTH-pCPA alignment is working for the governments who own and fund public drug programs but has yet to lead to coverage for all appropriate patients in all provinces. There is still a way to go to ensure that patients with unmet needs can access high-cost innovative medicines that alleviate suffering, prevent premature death, and/or significantly improve their quality of life.

'Mapping' Health State Utility Values from Non-preference-Based Measures: A Systematic Literature Review in Rare Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to monitor the effects of disease and treatment on patient symptomatology and daily life is increasing in rare diseases (RDs) (i.e. those affecting less than one in 2000 people); however, these instruments seldom yield health state utility values (HSUVs) for cost-utility analyses. In such a context, 'mapping' allows HSUVs to be obtained by establishing a statistical relationship between a 'source' (e.g. a disease-specific PROM) and a 'target' preference-based measure [e.g. the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) tool]. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review all published studies using 'mapping' to derive HSUVs from non-preference-based measures in RDs, and identify any critical issues related to the main features of RDs, which are characterised by small, heterogeneous, and geographically dispersed patient populations. METHODS: The following databases were searched during the first half of 2019 without time, study design, or language restrictions: MEDLINE (via PubMed), the School of Health and Related Research Health Utility Database (ScHARRHUD), and the Health Economics Research Centre (HERC) database of mapping studies (version 7.0). The keywords combined terms related to 'mapping' with Orphanet's list of RD indications (e.g. 'acromegaly') in addition to 'rare' and 'orphan'. 'Very rare' diseases (i.e. those with fewer than 1000 cases or families documented in the medical literature) were excluded from the searches. A predefined, pilot-tested extraction template (in Excel®) was used to collect structured information from the studies. RESULTS: Two groups of studies were identified in the review. The first group (n = 19) developed novel mapping algorithms in 13 different RDs. As a target measure, the majority used EQ-5D, and the others used the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) and 15D; most studies adopted ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. The second group of studies (n = 9) applied previously published algorithms in non-RDs to comparable RDs, mainly in the field of cancer. The critical issues relating to 'mapping' in RDs included the availability of very few studies, the relatively high number of cancer studies, and the absence of research in paediatric RDs. Moreover, the reviewed studies recruited small samples, showed a limited overlap between RD-specific and generic PROMs, and highlighted the presence of cultural and linguistic factors influencing results in multi-country studies. Lastly, the application of existing algorithms developed in non-RDs tended to produce inaccuracies at the bottom of the EQ-5D scale, due to the greater severity of RDs. CONCLUSIONS: More research is encouraged to develop algorithms for a broader spectrum of RDs (including those affecting young children), improve mapping study quality, test the generalisability of algorithms developed in non-RDs (e.g. HIV) to rare variants or evolutions of the same condition (e.g. AIDS wasting syndrome), and verify the robustness of results when mapped HSUVs are used in cost-utility models.

[Navigating in rare oceans: notes from a family survey of children and adolescents living with rare diseases]. / Navegando em águas raras: notas de uma pesquisa com famílias de crianças e adolescentes vivendo com doenças raras.

This article seeks to highlight the construction of social navigation in a hospital. Our focus is to reflect on scenes of application of a questionnaire on family costs of care/treatment of children with rare diseases. These processes are linked to the markers of gender, race, and generation of one of the authors. The interaction between researcher and subjects of field research is socially constructed according to the specific circumstances that demarcate the invitation to participate in the research, as well as data collection. It implies that his position as a researcher and the ethical perspective need to be well defined. The approach and ethics build this social navigation with the hospital and the subjects are permeated by difficulty and uncertainty, but also by surprises and learning. It was possible to observe remarkable characteristics of the institution, of their employees and the families, to evaluate the used methodological strategies.

No presente artigo, procura-se evidenciar a construção da navegação social em um hospital. O enfoque dado privilegiou os bastidores da aplicação de um questionário quantitativo sobre os custos da família com os cuidados/tratamento de seu(sua) filho(a) com doença rara. Permeando a descrição desses processos estão os marcadores de gênero, raça e geração de um dos autores deste artigo. A interação entre pesquisador e sujeitos da pesquisa em campo é socialmente construída, conforme as circunstâncias específicas que demarcam o convite para participar da pesquisa, bem como a coleta de dados, por isso o lugar que ocupa e a postura ética precisam estar bem definidos e claros para o pesquisador. O exercício metodológico e ético de construção desta navegação social com a instituição hospitalar e os sujeitos pesquisados foi permeada por dificuldade e incertezas, mas também por surpresas e aprendizados. Foi possível observar características marcantes da instituição, de seus funcionários e das famílias entrevistadas e, avaliar as estratégias metodológicas utilizadas.

Navegando em águas raras: notas de uma pesquisa com famílias de crianças e adolescentes vivendo com doenças raras / Navigating in rare oceans: notes from a family survey of children and adolescents living with rare diseases

Resumo No presente artigo, procura-se evidenciar a construção da navegação social em um hospital. O enfoque dado privilegiou os bastidores da aplicação de um questionário quantitativo sobre os custos da família com os cuidados/tratamento de seu(sua) filho(a) com doença rara. Permeando a descrição desses processos estão os marcadores de gênero, raça e geração de um dos autores deste artigo. A interação entre pesquisador e sujeitos da pesquisa em campo é socialmente construída, conforme as circunstâncias específicas que demarcam o convite para participar da pesquisa, bem como a coleta de dados, por isso o lugar que ocupa e a postura ética precisam estar bem definidos e claros para o pesquisador. O exercício metodológico e ético de construção desta navegação social com a instituição hospitalar e os sujeitos pesquisados foi permeada por dificuldade e incertezas, mas também por surpresas e aprendizados. Foi possível observar características marcantes da instituição, de seus funcionários e das famílias entrevistadas e, avaliar as estratégias metodológicas utilizadas.

Abstract This article seeks to highlight the construction of social navigation in a hospital. Our focus is to reflect on scenes of application of a questionnaire on family costs of care/treatment of children with rare diseases. These processes are linked to the markers of gender, race, and generation of one of the authors. The interaction between researcher and subjects of field research is socially constructed according to the specific circumstances that demarcate the invitation to participate in the research, as well as data collection. It implies that his position as a researcher and the ethical perspective need to be well defined. The approach and ethics build this social navigation with the hospital and the subjects are permeated by difficulty and uncertainty, but also by surprises and learning. It was possible to observe remarkable characteristics of the institution, of their employees and the families, to evaluate the used methodological strategies.